BREAKING: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo made it clear that he would NOT accept an endorsement from President Trump in the NYC mayoral race. chuong

BREAKING: Andrew Cuomo Rejects Trump Endorsement in the New York City Mayoral Race

In a headline-making statement, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has made it crystal clear — he would

not accept an endorsement from President Donald Trump in the New York City mayoral race. The declaration, delivered during a recent interview, immediately sent ripples through both state and national politics, drawing sharp attention to Cuomo’s attempt to define his political independence in a polarized landscape.

“I don’t want Donald Trump involved in this race,” Cuomo said firmly, emphasizing that accepting Trump’s backing would undermine his integrity and alienate voters who value local autonomy. The former governor suggested that any perceived alliance with Trump could create “unwanted political baggage,” particularly in a city that has long leaned progressive and remains largely hostile to the former president’s influence.

Trump, meanwhile, has reportedly been eyeing the New York City mayoral race from behind the scenes — not as a candidate himself, but as a potential “kingmaker.” In recent weeks, Trump has praised Cuomo’s leadership style while criticizing his main rival,

Zohran Mamdani, calling him a “fake socialist” and warning that a Mamdani administration could lead to “federal funding problems” for New York.

Cuomo’s rejection, however, signals that he wants no part of that association. Analysts say the decision was both strategic and symbolic: while Trump’s support might energize conservative and moderate voters, it could be politically toxic in deep-blue New York City. “In this environment, even a handshake with Trump could cost Cuomo thousands of votes,” said one political observer. “He knows it — and he’s distancing himself early.”

The 2025 mayoral race has already become one of the most unpredictable contests in decades. Progressive Democrat Zohran Mamdani — a state assemblyman from Queens known for his left-wing activism — emerged as the Democratic frontrunner after winning the party’s primary. Cuomo, who lost in the Democratic primary, is now running as an independent under the newly formed “

Fight and Deliver Party,” seeking to position himself as a centrist alternative.

Meanwhile, former Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa is also in the race, hoping to capitalize on voter frustration with both parties. The once-crowded field thinned out after incumbent Mayor

Eric Adams dropped out, reportedly under pressure following a series of scandals and declining approval ratings.

Polls show Mamdani maintaining a lead heading into the final stretch, with Cuomo trailing in second place. Despite that, Cuomo’s campaign remains determined, banking on his executive experience, name recognition, and appeal to disillusioned moderates. Yet, distancing himself from Trump could prove a double-edged sword — while it helps maintain credibility with Democratic-leaning voters, it also cuts off a potential path to conservative donors and media allies.

Political strategists argue that Cuomo’s statement reflects his broader attempt to rebrand himself after years of controversy. Following his resignation in 2021 amid misconduct allegations, Cuomo spent much of the past few years rebuilding his image through local community projects and selective media appearances. His independent mayoral run is widely viewed as his political comeback — and rejecting Trump’s backing helps him frame that comeback as his

own, free from outside influence.

Still, the stakes are high. The November 4, 2025, election could redefine New York City politics for years to come. With Trump looming over the national stage and Mamdani pushing the city’s progressive movement to new heights, Cuomo finds himself walking a political tightrope — trying to prove that he can lead New York without bowing to either extreme.

Whether that balancing act will resonate with voters remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: in rejecting Trump’s endorsement, Andrew Cuomo has drawn a clear line in the sand — and in doing so, reignited one of America’s most intriguing political rivalries.

BREAKING NEWS: Australian Sports Commission Threatens to BOYCOTT the 2028 Olympics if Lia Thomas Competes – Calls It a Case of “Biological Unfairness” and Demands Reform from World Aquatics

October 2025 — The global sports community is in turmoil after reports surfaced claiming that the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) has threatened to boycott the 2028 Olympic Games if transgender swimmer

Lia Thomas is allowed to compete. The alleged statement described the situation as a case of “biological unfairness” and called for urgent reform from World Aquatics.

Background and the Viral Claim

Posts spreading rapidly across social media claimed that the ASC would support a nationwide decision to withdraw from the 2028 Olympics should Lia Thomas be permitted to participate. The viral narrative suggested that Australia’s top swimmers were demanding that World Aquatics take immediate action to “protect biological fairness” in women’s categories.

However, AAP FactCheck and other verified news outlets have confirmed that the alleged boycott threat is false. Both the Australian Sports Commission and Swimming Australia have publicly denied making or supporting any such statement.

“The Australian Sports Commission confirms it has never made any such statement,” the organization said in an official clarification.
Similarly, Swimming Australia emphasized: “At no stage has Mollie O’Callaghan provided any commentary on transgender athletes.”

Despite these corrections, the viral claim sparked intense debate online about fairness, gender identity, and inclusion in competitive sports.

Lia Thomas and the Debate Over “Biological Unfairness”

Lia Thomas — the first openly transgender woman to win an NCAA swimming championship — has been at the center of a long-running international controversy. Critics argue that her participation in women’s categories gives her an “unfair biological advantage” due to male puberty. Supporters, however, see her as a symbol of inclusion and equality in modern sports.

In 2022, World Aquatics implemented new rules stating that any athlete who has experienced male puberty is not eligible to compete in female events. Under these guidelines, Lia Thomas is currently barred from women’s competitions.

Still, some advocacy groups continue to push for policy reform, suggesting a more individualized approach — possibly allowing athletes to compete based on measured hormone levels or transitional status. This ongoing tension has kept Lia Thomas’s name at the forefront of discussions on “biological fairness” and gender inclusion in sports.

Reactions and Global Impact

Following the spread of the false boycott claim, reactions poured in from across the world:

Supporters of the alleged boycott argued that “biological fairness” must remain the foundation of women’s sports and praised Australia for supposedly taking a stand.
Trans rights advocates condemned the rumor and the backlash surrounding it, calling it “discriminatory” and a reflection of how misinformation fuels transphobia.
Analysts pointed out that even though the story was fake, it highlights the fragile balance between fairness and inclusion — and how misinformation can quickly escalate into political or diplomatic tension within the global sports community.

The incident also raised broader concerns about how false news can damage reputations and create unnecessary controversy. As misinformation spreads faster than fact-checks, institutions like ASC and World Aquatics face growing pressure to respond quickly and clearly.

Broader Implications

While the claim that the Australian Sports Commission threatened to boycott the 2028 Olympics has been proven false, it sparked a larger conversation about:

Biological Fairness vs. Equality: Can there ever be a perfect policy that honors both inclusivity and competitive balance?
The Role of Sports Federations: Should organizations like World Aquatics and the IOC revisit or update gender eligibility guidelines in light of evolving science?
The Danger of Viral Misinformation: How easily a single fake post can inflame public sentiment, damage athlete reputations, and polarize debate.

In the end, the “boycott story” serves as a cautionary tale. It underscores the power — and peril — of viral information in an age when sports and identity politics are increasingly intertwined. As the world prepares for Los Angeles 2028, one thing is certain: the discussion around fairness, gender, and inclusion in sports is far from over.